“The Language of Museums”: New England Museum Association’s Annual Conference 2015

  • Introduction to the Conference
  • Review of Sessions and Events
  • Reflection on Experience

Introduction to NEMA 2015 and Background to Session Selection

For the year 2015, New England Museum Association known as “NEMA” selected Portland, Maine as the host city for the annual conference, and the Holiday Inn by-the-Bay as the site for this year’s conference: “The Language of Museums.” Beginning after sunset on Tuesday November 3 and ending mid-afternoon on Friday November 6, I would enjoy walking two blocks over reddish-brown bricks from the Westin Portland Harborview Hotel to the Holiday Inn, to participate in the few days of this deeply appreciated, and well-loved, annual gathering.

As expected, this regional conference was intended primarily for New England organizations –whether NEMA individual/institutional members, potential members, businesses of the region, university students/staff, and non-members– and customarily offers a chock-full of activities, receptions, and presentations for its conference attendees which are intended to be inclusive of all museums and (if applicable) appeal to their different departments. Thus, an ongoing dilemma existed for its attendees: many of the sessions, particularly during the daytime, were scheduled concurrently. Thus, making it a difficult task to decide which session to participate. Would it be best for you to attend a session that will help you in your current job? Attend a session that will aid the development of a skill that you are curious about personally or professionally? Attend a session that will assist you with an improved understanding of the role of a colleague from another department? Attend a session that will stretch you –and challenge you– to consider a variety of perspective(s) on a controversial topic? Attend a specific session –while your museum colleagues attend concurrent others– to strategize your institution to absorb (theoretically) as much of the content available as possible? Or, would you prioritize a session that would combine a number of these aforementioned priorities?

As someone who juggles several jobs, in museums as well as in the public schools, and who would have the unsurprisingly effortless ability to relate to the content of several sessions, it was inevitable that it would be hard for me, at times, to pick only one session. For, once you were in a room for a session, it meant, for certain, you were selecting not to be in another, and, if you left a session for whatever reason, then you were missing out on the rest of that particular session by leaving! In other words, by picking one, you were not picking the others — and for me, the ramifications were a loss of information.

Furthermore, it was also a challenge to pick which session because –while it is certain that no presentation would be greater viewing it online than seeing it in person– no sessions were recorded at NEMA and posted online like other conferences such as Museum Computer Network. This meant, if you did not experience it at NEMA 2015, you will not have the opportunity again. (Fortunately, some attendees tweeted during the conference and used the hashtag #NEMA2015, so typing that in on Twitter, you could have a written sampling of the other sessions. This is one great example from NEMA 2015 – placed together in Storify.) In any case, the session decision-making to me kind of resembled the decision that I have to make when I am at the eye doctor updating my prescription for my glasses, when I am peering through lens “A” and then lens “B” and back to lens “A,” then deciding which lens that I see through is better, because it was often very close, and sometimes identical. In any case, I did it! I made my selection!

With my reading of the conference booklet ahead of time –really thinking deeply about what might be best for me– and committing to them by writing them in my planner, on Friday I found myself departing the conference hugely grateful that the sessions that I planned to attend had turned out to be worthwhile, and as you will read later in this blog entry, some sessions were even life-changing, in terms of sharpening the way of how I interpret the world. While I am just as sure that I missed out on some pretty phenomenal conversations and exciting presentations, that is okay, it was unavoidable. I have to just be satisfied with what I did.

Before I discuss some of the information that I gleamed from the sessions at NEMA 2015, I would like to preface it with my gratitude to attend this year’s annual conference. My participation would not have happened without networking in Boston and having some very kind people help me financially to attend. Thank you so much! (You know who you are.)

With my thankful heart out there, I believe that I can demonstrate in this blog post that it was worth being at NEMA 2015 alone for the information. I truly made the most of everything that I could –by dismissing my social exhaustion and overload of ideas and activities– and persevered to attend all sessions and events that I planned on doing.

Lastly, it was nice to be at NEMA because it felt like being like a student again. I like listening to people give presentations about a topic, and how I was learning from them by considering their perspectives, and connecting to what was talked about, with what I know and have experienced. It was fun to take notes and just have an opportunity to think. In any case, I hope to give in the following section a glimpse of the value of each session that I sat in on at NEMA. The following paragraphs are the immediate takeaway thoughts from the sessions at the conference.


NOVEMBER 3, 2015

Networking about Networking (pre-conference event)

Starting at 7 o’clock in one of the conference hotel’s rooms, attendees mingled together for a bit. Then, NEMA Executive Director Dan Yaeger and the co-chair of NEMA Young and Emerging Professionals (known as NEMA “YEPs”) Alli Rico put a pause on the conversations and asked the attendees to suggest tips for networking. A number of people spoke up.

The one person’s advice that struck me in particular:

Instead of asking the trite, questions like “what do you do?”, which I know personally can lead to an awkward start to a conversation, this person suggested to ask open-ended questions that are intelligent. When this conference attendee suggested using open-ended questions when speaking to someone for the first time, I connected it to my experience teaching in the classroom (where I ask my students of the day, for example: “what questions do you have?”, instead of “are there any questions?” which the latter seeks only a flat reply of “yes” or “no”). I understand it, and I will try.

NOVEMBER 4, 2015

Speaking the Same Language: Good Governance Practices and Pitfalls [for board members and museum directors]

Due to my first choice being overcrowded (people were sitting on the floor), this session was the only one that I did not plan on attending initially. I ducked out of the first and randomly joined this one down the hall. However, it was fortuitous: this session on governance ended up being helpful to me, especially that I serve on a board of directors for a tiny historical society in northern Vermont. I left with in-depth understanding of the responsibilities of a board member, and I left with a better understanding of the responsibilities and roles of a museum director and the chair of a board, which may not be relevant to me now, but if I work again in a museum with this structure in place, it will be helpful to have some recommended practices in mind.

Some of the tips? Have the executive director and the chairperson sit next to each other at meetings to show unity (and, also, to allow notes being shared!). Another was to conduct a 360 degrees performance review of the director. Not done secretively, as to push out the director, but for the best practices. Also, for everyone on the board, the importance of attendance to meetings – if you are not there, you cannot participate in the conversation.

Keynote Speaker: Peter Korn, author of “Why We Make Things and Why It Matters”

Peter Korn, the director of the Center for Furniture Craftmanship in Rockland, Maine, was a lovely speaker for the keynote (and not just because I adore studying American decorative arts!). A few reasons why he was an interesting speaker: he spoke on the importance of craft (such as: how craft may not be financially as valued, but it is valued for the fulfillment to self, not unlike museum work and museums), and also because he masterfully combined various academic disciplines like physics and history, which at least something in the speech would appeal to the several hundred people in the room. The speaker unfortunately had a long time to fill –he resorted at points to reading paragraphs from his book– and I wish, given my interest in early furniture and early tools, that he could have discussed a little about dovetails and hand planes (as he said that he wished to)! I am sure, like he said, he could have gone on and on about that. But, I am sure that it would not be so entertaining to a huge, diverse crowd! As for the presentation as a whole, it would have been helpful to have images of his woodworking school during his speech, so that the attendees could see his place of work as he referred to it…

In any case, it might have been nicer for the conference to have an extra fifteen minutes or so taken from this lecture time and tackled on to the forty-five minutes of newly inserted “free time” after the lecture (in other words: cut the presentation short to allow the attendees more time to do something else). Something else could be have been optional breakout groups, or it could have been seeing exhibition approaches at a neighboring museum (I attempted the latter), or something else. As I was not the only NEMA attendee who left the conference hotel who decided to visit the Maine Historical Society… if I had a just few minutes more, I think that I would have been able to tour the historic house. This would have been really spectacular given my interests in early America, and for my own curiosity stemming from interpreting decorative arts related to Longfellow’s poetry…

However, in retrospect, I suppose that I cannot do NEMA 2015 in Portland again, but I theoretically can visit MHS anytime. So my updated activity suggestion would be: have a suggested board listing neighboring museums, have everyone meet at the lobby after the speaker, and journey over together. You would be able to meet people, talk about the conference so far (including the keynote speaker), but also, you be able to visit the museum independently if you would like.

Following my visit to the MHS, I discovered at lunchtime, to my delight, that the person who sat next to me grew up in a neighboring Vermont town and attended the high school where I currently work (I did not attend the school). He also shared with me the wonderful news that would emerge shortly: Historic New England was making in roads in Vermont (the last state in New England where HNE has not had much of a presence) and had created an alliance with the Henry Sheldon Museum, Middlebury, Vermont. Wow! Big news! So exciting!

If a Picture is Worth a Thousand Words, What Do Museums What to Say? Historic New England [Moving objects and re-thinking website access to those objects] 

Historic New England is consistently impressive by how the organization thinks carefully through every detail.

Stump the Lawyers – Legal Issues for Museums

After a half hour of the panel for Historic New England, I walked downstairs to “Stump the Lawyers.” As I am more acquainted with HNE from attending the Program in New England Studies (known as “PINES”) on scholarship in 2013 and from participating in an alumni luncheon in Quincy, MA in the month of September of this year, it made sense to challenge myself to do something other than HNE. Because I was so taken with the thoroughness of attention to detail in a prior year’s lawyers’ discussion of Nazi-looted art (Newport 2013), I chose this year’s hour-long lawyer session. At this “Stump the Lawyers” session, attendees could ask questions of a panel of lawyers, who each had a connection to, or a specialization related to museums like: copyright law (increasingly complex issue with the use of the Internet), and employment law. This session was was not as tightly focused as 2013, but I absorbed a few bits of random information, including the value of clarifying a job description/position checklist, especially as job duties change.

I also received from the one of the lawyers on the panel her handouts about copyright.

Which Plans and Policies Does the Museum Really Need?

The humor of Wyona Lynch-McWrite of the Fruitlands Museum and the panelist on her side (did not get his name) was well-appreciated for the post-tea, pre-dinner slump. The panelists kept attendees, including myself, laughing throughout, but, most importantly, we kept focused. This reminds of the presentation on C-SPAN 3 that I viewed this morning about the Unknown Soldier, where the lecturer Thomas Tudor spoke about –literally and figuratively– a grave topic, and yet sprinkled in humorous personal anecdotes when appropriate.

In any case, the panel’s handout from American Alliance of Museums outlined important plans and policies to have in the museum, and the panel went through this handout, allowing for interspersed questions from the audience.

This session also nailed some of museum culture, including “how staff [sometimes] can’t stay in their own lane.”

Opening Reception at Portland Museum of Art

Particularly because many of us attending the session were museum professionals or trained in museums (and respect museum policies), I was disappointed that only the Biennial exhibition “You Can’t Get There From Here” was open. While I understand it may have been a financial and/or a staffing issue as the reason why the other galleries were closed, I wish that the other galleries remained open to see. While I had read a exhibition review of the Biennial in October and I was ready to see how the review compares with my own response, I was so disappointed not to see the American art collection and the decorative arts from the United States. The PMA has a lovely, small collection. I had last seen them in the fall of 2011, and I was curious to see how I would see the same collection, but differently, as I have increased my knowledge in the subject matter since, by watching academic lectures, reading books, visiting museums/historic sites, and interpreting decorative arts collections as a visitor guide. (Personally, it would have been great to have conversations with other conference attendees about these collections and learn from others their responses to the content, display, and description.) While I did sneak back to the PMA at the tail-end of a lunch hour on another day, I wished that I could have seen the PMA at the reception and use the additional lunchtime for another museum, especially since Portland is small, walkable, and a museum-rich city. Or, I had the time to re-visit the decorative arts collection at the PMA because one visit is not enough to take it all in.

Feeling embarrassingly querulous right now, because I am really grateful to attend NEMA at all, but there was another (minor) disappointment at the reception at the PMA: the event was advertised as heavy hors d’oeuvres and that you receive a free drink, but the treats were limited –handed out only by servers– and the caterers ran out of local beer — and, so, inevitably conference attendees left the PMA (presumably to network elsewhere). I, coming to this conference with one of my biggest priorities to network, felt like this was a lost opportunity to meet the other conference attendees. Plus, I was getting hungry, and after a packed day of sessions, it was getting harder to think straight and have a relaxed composure.

Bottom line, the cost to attend the reception was high, yet it yielded a low value, and then, what added to the slight, I would have to spend more money elsewhere. Luckily, I ended up conversing with another young person, who was also looking at the art books at the PMA gift shop, and we later banded together to find a restaurant to have a snack to fill our bellies. That was a terrific happenstance: to meet someone who was another emerging museum professional, and to learn about her museum which is just getting started.

NOVEMBER 5, 2015

Foreign Language Teaching at Colby

Though this conference as whole demonstrated the wide range of interpretation of the word “language,” the subject matter of foreign language is likely the quintessence of what someone would associate initially as an apt topic for a conference with the theme of “Language of Museums.”

There are many reasons why this was an excellent –thought-provoking– session than an overt connection with the word “language”. I will not have the space in this blog post to discuss the academic content packed into the four presentations, and about the museum-tied curriculum tried by three panelists, who are employed at Colby as professors of language, but I did want to mention about a few unusual aspects of this session that stood out. One atypical aspect, in contrast to many NEMA sessions, the session chair and her selected three panelists worked together at the same institution, and that the chair and each professor worked together for at least over the course of an academic semester. The other sessions that I attended at NEMA typically had panelists on a panel from different organizations. Other than Historic New England’s presentation from the day before, I do not believe that there was another panel that I sat in on that had all of the panelists solely from one institution. It also spoke very highly of the session chair that every single panelist acknowledged how helpful that the chair was at her job at the university museum, overseeing and coordinating museum activities, with the curriculum, with the college’s various academic departments.

Another unusual aspect –not necessary unique, but it was effective– was that the session chair started her presentation by putting up an image of a work by James Abbott McNeill Whistler and asked the audience to interpret it, individually, in a different language than English.

The point of the exercise was not whether or not if you could come up with prose about the interpretation of the art in another language. It was rather to understand a student who may not be able to either: interpret the art (like an art historian, curator, or professor) or write in a foreign language well. This exercise also illustrated to oneself where you are at at your particular language ability, and I saw that, again, I know some French and I know some more of Spanish, but I am a master of neither, because I am not fluent enough to translate exactly my interpretation of the artwork. (I have an undergraduate background in Art History and I work as a seasonal guide for two museums.) Without intending to, the session thus made me personally grateful that I substitute teach regularly in foreign language classes of all levels, and I get to refine and review information about foreign languages often, because knowing other languages is a critical ability. Knowing another language is especially essential for museum work, since you have visitors and objects from all over, but it is also good to have a background in different languages for general participation in our increasingly connected, global world.

In any case, this trick of having the audience try the translation exercise before discussing how students might have felt, was helpful. You experienced it, and you could then put yourself in the shoes of other language learners. I wished that another one of my sessions, Effective Typography, tried this strategy. Instead of the presenters for Effective Typography showing us a paragraph and then discussing what was wrong with the typography, the presenters could have the audience guess at some of the errors. That way, the audience has a baseline of what they already know and what they would not be able to pick out on their own. Furthermore, I appreciated personally the Foreign Language panel because one of the speakers discussed an upper-level course discussing “the self” and how she utilized a blog format for students to explore themselves. It reminds me of the various visual decisions and about the writing that I have for this blog, “the Museum Philosopher.”

Last but not least, I thought that observation of the task of having students discuss art at the university museum in a language other than English, and seeing that simultaneously, visitors to the museum, who were not part of the class, had a reminder of the global world (especially as Maine being a largely white and English-speaking state), was great. The languages spoken in the university museum was an unexpected benefit of the collaboration between a professor of language and the academic programs coordinator at this university museum. The professor’s observation of this unanticipated perk was a thoughtful detail.

How to Have a Difficult Conversation at Work

In this session, after brainstorming thoughts and feelings about difficult conversations at work, the speakers had every audience member work in a pair to act out a conversation of a few imagined-but-relatable workplace scenarios. Then, these role plays were discussed together as a group. This set-up of acting out a scenario and then having the whole audience discuss together, made it harder to extract the “tips” for conveying your meaning effectively when you are engaging in a conversation back at your real-life workplace, because the ideas were said in the group discussion were crafted in the perspectives of the people that we played in the conversations, and there was not an overall generalization, or tip, learned from each scenario. You could try to extract meaning, but it was challenging to think in the role play-discussion structure, especially since the notes available were not thoroughly gone over (I found myself scanning them quickly during the session and trying to utilize them in the scenarios), and, additionally, some of the text on the presentation screen was tiny (the presenters included memes, pictures, and comics) that you were trying to read and process.

However, I believe that the speaker’s handouts of phrases to try, as well as a list of resources, would help anyone with the specific applicability to any workplace. So that was worth having.

Overall, I admired this pair of speakers because both of them communicated well. Neither of the speakers sounded rehearsed, just impromptu — which is often difficult to pull off. I also thought their inclusion of mindfulness as an assistance to having difficult conversations, and inevitable stress, was a unique angle.

Library and Archives Professional Affinity Group / Curators Professional Affinity Group 

I jointed this Library and Archives PAG because I was attending the conference as the person, who oversees a small historical society collection of objects and documents in a town library, and I may find myself one day working on a grant. As I ate from my box lunch, I listened to panel speak about grants, which seemed to offer some useful information, but pretty specific. I also wished to meet people and this session was not interested in learning who was in the room. Furthermore, as I am not actively working on a grant, when I finished my lunch, I decided to hop over to the abandoned property conversation with the curatorial PAG because abandoned property is also relevant to my volunteer role of Collections Manager and Archivist. Since the curatorial group appeared to be finished with the main presentation and had since disbanded to small roundtables, I sat with a table and, through the small conversations, I ended up receiving some personalized tips for my historical society, such as: how to share instructions with the front line staff, who are not affiliated with the society (our historical society is located in a town library).

In retrospect, I wish that I also joined the Registrars’ Professional Affinity Group because the description said that the group was going to get to know each other (again, one of my goals was meeting people) and that, sometimes, I have the tendency to be focused on the enjoyment of learning the academic content out of a session, than what may make more sense for me career-wise. Also, I noticed in the description for this PAG luncheon, that the PAG leader works in an academic museum, which, if there was time, I would have liked to ask that person about his career arc because I am –given my past background in museums and current background in schools– interested in working in a museum, archive, or library, that is part of an academic institution. But I did not want to go into a session more than half-way through.

In any event, I saw an opportunity of time during the rest of lunch to go visit the PMA. I spent my time with the decorative arts collection, including the small temporary exhibition of decorative arts in the McLellan House. This also allowed me the chance to go read from a few of the books in the upstairs reading rooms, including about collector Katherine Prentis Murphy, and the founders of Winterthur and Shelburne Museum (which I did not intend to do, but happened to stumble upon). I also discovered that I was not alone in choosing to visit the PMA after the PAG lunches. I suspect everyone who “jumped ship” from the conference hotel was equally grateful for the proximity to the PMA because it permitted more thorough time exploring what the PMA has to offer. (As we are museum folk, and we enjoy museums!) More critically, I found that visiting the museum offered me some peace and quiet for reflection, especially that my brain was overwhelmed with ideas from the conference and from being in an ongoing conversation mode with other conference attendees.

Effective Typographic Communication

I attended Effective Typographic Communication because of personal interest –in college, I studied rare and contemporary books, design, and type (I have an undergraduate minor in Book Arts)– and because of professional skill-building, in case that I am asked to design exhibitions or edit signs for a museum. I worried part way through the session that perhaps I should go to another session, such as: “Hey, Can I Use This Image? Navigating the World of Copyright” as this session would also be great to learn about more, and because the Typographic presenters mentioned that their materials would be on the NEMA website to reference. However, I am glad that I stuck it out at this session of typography because, one, it was enjoyable and humorous, and two, because I found out when looking at the presentation later that the interesting information that I received from the session was not online. A case in point was that one of the session presenters mentioned that they had designed their presentation with the hopes that all the attendees could read it and, as a physical member of the audience, I could then be the judge of the success of their design. That was neat.

Overall, through the pair of presenters for this session: a senior professional –who called himself the “Cranky Typographer”– and a young graphic design professional –who called herself “Q”– I changed how I looked at type. Maybe it is because I studied typography in college, but all the same, I observed that I started judging every sign or piece of literature that I saw post-session, and whether the typography added to the content or subtracted from it. Ohhh, that is a bleed text and that is very hard to read… Ohhh, that is handwritten text, but it gives a hand-made sense…. Ohhh, that is a sans serif text, but that makes sense because it is online and the sans serif makes it easier to read…

In other words, good and bad typography, and all between, is everywhere. Whether I am on exhibits team at a larger museum, at a smaller museum and have to self-design promotional materials, or if I am wanting to update my blog design, the information that I picked up from this session will certainly improve “the quality of and function of my work,” which was the primary goal of the presenters. This session was really for everyone, and not because the senior presenter, the “Crank Typographer,” handed out mini-signs which read: “Reminder to self: I don’t know it all. Nobody is born knowing everything. We’re all idiots about something. I must look stuff up!”

Haha, so true. (-:

Children’s Museum and Theatre of Maine – crafting and taco food truck for Dia de los Muertos

At the Children’s Museum, I was struck by the bold colors of the exhibits, the grown-up information accompanying these exhibits, and the customization of the exhibits to the local area, e.g. lobster fishing, in proximity to a typical grocery store exhibit. I also loved the night’s feeling of relaxation — making a craft of a flower related to a cultural tradition Dia de los Muertos, decorating a skull cookie with tubes of colorful sugar, and having local fish and veggie tacos, paired with Allagash (a local beer).

Unlike the PMA where attendees were regulated only to two spaces (where inescapably the lobby, with the enticement of food and drinks, became really loud), the Children’s Museum was completely open to explore, and I found that there was plenty of quiet space to have a conversation. On the lowest level, I really appreciated the conversations with others, who filled me in on sessions that I did not go to. Additionally, I was able to help someone brainstorm ideas for her middle school visitors because my museum jobs are in the education department (I am familiar with constructivist theories and Visual Thinking Strategies) and I also work regularly with middle schoolers in the public schools.

NOVEMBER 6, 2015

Career Conversation with Nina Zannieri – Lifetime Achievement Award Winner

I was not sure what this particular career conversation would look like — the description in the conference booklet was primarily her background: employment, academic degrees, and professional service. Furthermore, my memory of attending a “career conversation” (at NEMA 2012 in Burlington, VT),  was the audience coming up with questions related to their career goals, and Ann Lawless, director of American Precision Museum, responding to them. I, however, decided to attend this career conversation because Nina holds a similar academic background to me (she studied in the humanities in undergrad and then studied museum studies for graduate school), and I wanted to learn about her career arc: how she went from museum hopeful, to being an award winner and being recognized in front of hundreds of attendees in 2015.

I particularly enjoyed her stories of best and worse moments, some of them humorous in retrospect. Of the “big picture” in her anecdotes, I saw that you can be an introvert and be successful, and I also saw that success was unforeseen, but that you have to keep working at it, and take risks, and that you never know where your network will help.

After this career conversation finished (it was scheduled only an hour, not as a regular session, which tends to be for an hour and half), I meant to go to the session on disability or the graphic design 101 session, but I decided against joining a session so late, and that it would be a better use of this half hour to check out of my hotel and bring over my belongings to store at the conference hotel, where I can utilize the following coffee break for more conversations.

What Does Your Facility Say to Your Visitors?

The big idea of this session was the suggestion of going through your museum, see how you visitor sees and experiences your museum, and notice how these (conscious or unconscious) decisions may “say” something to your visitor. This session focused on facility decisions specifically, which are, but not limited to, color schemes of signs, signs that are encumbered (say, by tree branches), a juxtaposition of different signs, the repair tools of the museum are out in sight…

I found that this session was exactly as the conference book promised: an overview, and then an opportunity for the audience to ask questions about their particular situations. The overview was comprised of two simultaneous parts: a photo slideshow assembled personally by the speaker, and then a concurrent commentary of the photo slideshow, looking at various museums’ decisions related to their facilities, and what it may “say” to visitors. Then, the floor was opened up for individual questions.

For the Q and A, I was brave enough to ask this full room of attendees, and the speaker, the following question: “the concerns, issues, and problems with our facilities, it is the people on the grounds who notice and deal with the results of these things, how can we channel it back to those who make the decisions: the administrative team?” I received a nod of understanding of the situation from the speaker, and then subsequent terrific responses from the other conference attendees, one included creating a structure for staff comments, such as in a daily log.

Awards Luncheon and Annual Meeting

Unfortunately, I only saw a part of this meeting. I had to depart in the middle of the luncheon, due to having to catch a ride with someone to the train station, so that I could take the Downeaster to Durham, NH (nearest to my destination of family in Portsmouth). Sadly, I missed out on what seemed to be a nice dessert of a slice of chocolate cake, as well as conversing further with my table-mates, whom I would have liked to have gotten to know further, especially since two of them were in the fields that I am involved with now: schools and museums, and it would have been great to hear about their career arc and how they wound up where they are today. There were also other emerging professionals at the table, and it would have great to have more of their thoughts about how the conference went for them.


What did I takeaway?

Business cards, a stack of paper handouts, and a brain still processing information from the conference sessions, personal conversations, and physical sights, — I am at home, and now what? — what just happened, and how can I document it all? This blog post was definitely a start, but there is more that I did not capture: the one-on-one conversations before, during, or after a session, the morning workouts (I especially loved the NEMA YEPs morning run around seaside Old Port early one morning!), and the late night table discussions with other attendees out and about in Portland. Overall, it is evident by this post alone that I walked away with new energy and refined knowledge, and meeting the conference attendees who are just as excited about museums –and willing to do the hard work of improving our museums– was inspiring and will keep me motivated. For learning anything at all, and meeting the people that I did, I do have such appreciation for being able to have a presence at this year’s annual conference.

From writing this blog, I also observed a few patterns: that I was interested in hearing people’s journeys (how they got to where they are today) and that I was progressively less stressed as the conference went on because I was learning so much great material and that I was beginning to feel comfortable talking with people and with raising my hand. I also noticed that I intentionally made time to relax, including exercising every morning mainly in the hotel’s facilities (it also helped that I had an inevitable walk between hotels!), to sit and have a cup of hot chocolate from the lobby, and to visit museums in-between activities.

Lastly, I also saw that I have a great deal of intrapersonal knowledge. Particularly, I noticed that I prefer attending sessions that were more of a presentation or lecture format, rather than participatory sessions that have a workshop-feel and that rely on the knowledge and willingness of participation of the audience. In a way this makes sense to me, because I am introvert and shy, and that means conferences as a whole can be tough, draining, and uncomfortable. I also take time to process and organize information before sharing ideas externally. Closely related, I can analyze on multiple levels, so my mind is busy absorbing all aspects and needs processing time before I can communicate a singular thought or a question. I am a huge fan of reading and acquiring information by visual and verbal means, however, I prefer not verbal transmission only; I love having a visual to study and to refer to. Other people may be different. Others may learn through tasks and doing, and talking through matters with other participants. I would guess that for these the networking comes easier and that some of the more participatory sessions during conferences work really well for them. The sessions that were filled with tasks of brainstorming, group discussions, and making things, were likely a better fit for these learners with strong auditory and bodily kinesthetic abilities.

In any way you absorb and provide information, I believe that anyone at any level, involved or interested in museums, would have found sessions, people, and events at New England Museum Association conference not just entertaining and fun, but also useful and meaningful. You don’t have to take only my word, er, blog for it. Others blogged about their adventures at NEMA, too. (And here, too.) There was plenty of diverse sessions that appealed to different types of people and left them thinking for and about museums in a critical and important way. In closing, I hope the discussion of this year’s conference in Portland was helpful to you, the reader, as it was for me. What will next year’s conference NEMA 2016 in Mystic, Connecticut bring?

Adriene’s Background

Currently, I serve on a board of directors for a tiny historical society in Vermont. I am the Collections Manager and Archivist for the society, and one of my roles is overseeing the society’s collection: I recommend new acquisitions, I interact with the community when an offer of object is not a good fit, I scan and email photos from our collection upon request, and in general, I manage our small collection of documents and objects. I am also an employee in two public school districts working with grades K-12, and an employee for two seasonal museums, both as a museum guide. At one of these museums, I also staff the information desk, where I juggle answering the calls from the museum’s main line, greeting museum visitors, helping visitors with wayfinding, and interpreting exhibitions.

I would love a job in a setting where I can conduct research and I can help others conduct research. I would also like work closely with physical objects, and also interpret collections and share information with others. As I am experienced in other roles: social media, collections management, and education in museums, I am also open to other, new possibilities.

Music: Q and A with Brian Lamb on C-SPAN, Stacy Schiff, Author of “The Witches: Salem 1692”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: